![]()
Shirin Kouladjie | Days of My Life : 2001.04.15 |
14 | 04.27 |

Could one trace a geneaology of collage from its modernist origins up through its various new media manifestations, or is the contemporary collage aesthetic itself a fragmented inheritance?
How do the genres of avant-garde poetry, experimental music and interactive writing relate to the collage aesthetic within the visual arts?
Can flash animation, digital art and other forms of emitted light qualify under the traditional rubric of collage, or are they more properly considered in a separate aesthetic category?
What is the significance of the mass media's use of the collage aesthetic via new media applications in its presentation of advertising, entertainment and news content?
Does the collage aesthetic betray a particular political ideology? How does the use of new media applications inform this dynamic?
Will improved access to cultural and material resources dilute or enhance the aesthetic and political impact of collage as an art form?
What might recent intersections between the collage aesthetic and new media applications suggest about broader questions of technology, urbanization and globalization?
What does the collage aesthetic (esp. in the age of new media applications) have to say about authenticity, influence, and originality?
What makes for an effective collage aesthetic?
Are there, as Chris Cutler suggests, legitimate and illegitimate applications of the collage aesthetic?
Or is the collage aesthetic an attempt to subvert the paradigm of legitimacy?
Does the collage aesthetic tend to be angry? Annoying? Funny? Unsettling?
Does the collage aesthetic translate well across genres (paper to digital to film to literary to music)?
Could/should the so-called right-of-integrity be revised in light of developments within new media?