Week 12
November 14, 2006
Miriam Schapiro, Homage, 1975
Mary Beth Edelson, Some Living
American Women Artists,
1972
Miriam Schapiro, Connection, 1976
Miriam Schapiro, First Fan, 1977
Sonia Delunay, Solar Prism, 1914
Sonia Delunay, Blanket, 1911
Piet Mondrian, Tableau II, 1921-25
Eva Hesse, Ennead, 1966
Jackie Winsor, Bound Grid,
1971-72
Harmony Hammond, Floor Piece
VI, 1973
Carl Andre, 144 Lead Plates and
144 Magnesium Plates, 1969
Joyce Kozloff, Hidden Chambers, 1975
Miriam Schapiro, Wonderland, 1983
Miriam Schapiro, Heartland, 1985
Emily Carr, Forest, British
Columbia, 1931
Georgia O'Keeffe, Black Iris,
1926
Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, The Artist
and his Model, 1910-26
Barnett Newman, Onement 1,
1948
Louise Bourgeois, Le Regard,
1966
Louise Bourgeois, Femme Maison, 1983
Louise Bourgeois, Fillette,
1968
Hannah Wilke, Centerfold,
1973
Hannah Wilke, SOS Starification
Object Series, 1974-1982
Judy Chicago, The Dinner Party,
1974-79 overall
settings for Virginia Wolffe, Emily Dickinson, and
Georgia O’Keeffe
Judy Chicago, Primordial Goddess and Fertility Goddess settings from
the Dinner Party
Miriam Schapiro: “Sentimentality for me is a very powerful
idea….The grid is there to indicate that this is about order….but the
handkerchief is there so you can cry when you remember all the tears
which soaked all the handkerchiefs from time gone by. My curious
aesthetic sense counts on the merger of the grid and the handkerchief.”
Mirian Schapiro: “Women have always collected things and saved
and recycled them because leftovers yielded nourishment in new
forms. The decorative functional objects women made
often spoke in a secret language, bore a covert imagery. When we
read these images in needlework, in paintings, in quilts, rugs and
scrapbooks, we sometimes fine a cry for help, sometimes an allusion to
a secret political alignment, sometimes a moving symbol of the
relationships between men and women. We base our interpretation
of the layered meanings in these works on what we know of our own
lives—a sort of archaeological reconstruction and
deciphering….Collected, saved and combined materials represented for
such women acts of pride, desperation, and necessity. Spiritual
survival depended on the harboring of memories. Each cherished
scrap of percale, muslin or chintz, each bead, each letter, each
photograph, was a reminder of its place in a woman’s life, similar to
an entry in a journal or a diary. Women’s culture is the
framework for femmage….”
Lucy Lippard: “I have no clear picture what, if anything, constitutes
women’s art, although I am convinced there is a latent difference in
sensibility….I have heard suggestions that the common factor is a vague
earthiness, organic images, curved lines, and, most convincingly, a
centralized focus.” ….There is now evidence that many women
artists have defined a central orifice whose formal organization is
often a metaphor for a woman’s body”
“A unifying density, an overall texture, often sensuously tactile and
often repetitive to the point of obsession, the preponderance of
circular forms and central focus, an ubiquitous linear ‘bag’ or
parabolic form that turns in on itself, layers or strata, an
indefinable looseness or flexibility of handling, a new fondness for
the pinks and pastels and ephemeral cloud colors that used to be
taboo.”
Barnett Newman: “The Kwakiutl artist painting on a hide did
not concern himself with the inconsequentials that made up the opulent
social rivalries of the Northwest Coast Indian scene; nor did he, in
the name of a higher purity, renounce the living world for the
meaningless materialism of design. The abstract shape he used,
his entire plastic language, was directed by a ritualistic will toward
metaphysical understanding. The everyday realities he left to the
toymakers; the pleasant play of nonobjective pattern, to the women
basket-weavers.”
----
November 16, 2006
Judy Chicago, The Dinner Party,
1974-79
settings for Virginia Wolffe and Emily Dickinson
Judy Chicago, Primordial Goddess and Fertility Goddess settings from
the Dinner Party
Louise Bourgeois in costume, 1970
Freestanding sculpture of Artemis at Ephesus, second century AD
Ana Mendieta, untitled silhouette, 1976
Ana Mendieta, Alma/Anima, 1975
Ana Mendietta, Rupestrian Sculpture (First Woman), 1981
Ana Mendietta, Rupestrian Sculpture (Goddess of the Wind and
Old Mother
Blood), 1981
Carolee Schneemann, Meat Joy,
1964
Judy Chicago, Suzanne Lacy, Sandra Orgel, Aviva Rahmani: Ablutions,
1972 *
Camille Grey, Lipstick Bathroom (from Womanhouse), 1972
Susan Frazier, Vicki Hodgetts, and Robin Weltsch, Nurturant Kitchen
(from
Womanhouse), 1972 *
Eleanor Antin, Carving: a Traditional Sculpture, 1973
Martha Rosler, Vital Statistics of a
Citizen, Simply Obtained, 1977
Jean-Honore Fragonard, Debut of the Model, 1765
Jean-Leon Gerome, Pygmalion and Galatea, 1882
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, Turkish Bath, 1862
Sylvia Sleigh, Turkish Bath, 1973
Joan Semmel, Secret Spaces, 1976
Joan Semmel, Hand Down, 1977
Mary Cassatt, Young Mother Nursing
Her Children, 1889
Mary Cassatt, The Mirror, 1905
Mary Kelley, Post Partum Document,
1975-79
Documentation 2: analyzed utterances and related speech events: Gah,
1975
Documentation 3: analyzed markings and diary perspective schema, 1975
Documentation 6: pre-writing alphabet, exergue and diary, 1978
Barbara Kruger, unititled (Your gaze hits the side of my face), 1982
Barbara Kruger, untitled (We have received orders not to move), 1982
Mary Cassatt, Woman in Black at the
Opera, 1880
Renoir, Box at the Theater, 1874
Barbara Kruger, untitled (We won't play nature to your culture), 1983
Barbara Kruger, untitled (Your fictions become history), 1983
Barbara Kruger, untitled (Surveillance is your busy work), 1983
Barbara Kruger, untitled (Your Body is a Battleground), 1989
Cindy Sherman, untitled film stills, 1978-1980
Librarian—cigarette
-tramp
-on the stairs
Cindy Sherman, untitled film still, 1979 (with mirror)
Sherrie Levine, Presidents #2, 1979
Sherrie Levine, Presidents #3, 1979
Sherrie Levine, After Walker Evans, 1981
Walker Evans, from Let Us Now Praise
Famous Men, 1936
Mary Kelly: “What’s discovered in working through the Post-Partum
Document is that there is no preexisting sexuality, no essential
femininity; and that to look at the processes of their construction is
also to see the possibility of deconstructing the dominant forms of
representing difference and justifying subordination in our social
order.”
Kate Linker: “Looking, Freud tells us, is not indifferent; it is
always implicated in a system of control.”
Roland Barthes: “To give a text an author is to impose a limit on
that text, to furnish it with a final signifier, to close the
writing….the text’s unity lies not in its origin but in its
destination….that someone who holds together in a single field all the
traces by which the written text is constituted….The birth of the
reader must be at the cost of the death of the Author.”